- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Royson James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person, fails WP:GNG & WP:ANYBIO. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. The editor whose username is Z0 17:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Fails WP:JOURNALIST. MB190417 (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. As always, a journalist is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because his existence can technically be verified by a primary source directory of his own work on the website of his own employer — a journalist does not get over our notability standards by being the author of coverage of other things, but by being the subject of coverage written by other people. Bearcat (talk) 12:47, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.